Anderson Cooper Publishes Thirty Minute Revenge Porn Special for Primetime

andersoncooper2

By Dickey Saunders Jr.

On March 25th, 2018, CBS flagship newsmagazine program “60 Minutes” aired a raunchy exposé by CNNs pre-eminent anchor Anderson Cooper. The news piece-cum-primetime erotica centered around an alleged affair between Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels, a world famous “Hall-of-Fame” adult film actress, and President Trump that allegedly started in 2006. The interview with Clifford delved into sordid details, and Clifford’s claims of what played out after the supposed relationship fizzled.

The troubling aspect of this interview is that it possesses an eerie essence similar to what our society, especially Democrats, feminists, and other flavors of “social justice warriors” in America deride as ”slut-shaming” and “revenge porn”. Though this may not have the crystallized artifacts of photo or video to be displayed across platforms, nor is the target of the shaming a female, this whole salacious spectacle that Cooper put together still delivers the same impact: content of sexual encounters, preferences, and tendencies of individuals involved in a fully consensual relationship are being revealed and distributed for the world to consume though not all the individuals involved in the narrative have consented to the publishing of said content.

President Trump has never confirmed the details of the alleged affair, never acknowledged any sexual interactions taking place between him and Clifford, and also never confirmed the hearsay nature of the details Clifford’s more precise details, such as whether the President used any birth control measures. Clifford made sure to mention that she allegedly spanked the President (no pants, but underwear was present) with a magazine that had featured the then reality TV billionaire’s face on the cover. She also made sure to state that she found Trump to be unattractive and that she did not enjoy her lascivious escapade with the notorious womanizing real-estate scion from New York  City.

This sort of petty kiss-and-tell, “butter-soft”core pornographic primetime programming for the world to see illustrates a major hypocrisy on display by the heavily leftist biased media, the Democratic party, feminists against being held to puritan-patriarchal sexual standards, and social justice warriors who have pledged that all victims of sex crimes should be believed first and perpetrators of all sexual abuse must be held accountable, sometimes, even at the expense of due process. This sort of sexually scandalous content being blasted across the screens of America represents exactly the kind of “you play by our rules, we play by no rules” standards that the collectivist coalitions that drive the Democratic party operate under. What we see as unnecessary, and even malicious gossip of a sexual nature being distributed on every medium available to assassinate the character of someone who cannot defend themselves against the allegations without first, against their will, admitting to the alleged encounters taking place, the collectivist and Marxist left see as a Late Night ratings boon for their mainstream media lapdogs and a brand new reason to start brand new witch hunts to impeach a lawfully elected President.

It is important to recognize when we see American leftist, Marxists, neo-Marxists, and Democrats using the sexuality of conservatives to demonize them and their character, that it is the perfect opportunity to take their narrative, flip it on its head, and deliver the crystallized hypocrisy ten-fold right back. They will use technicalities such as “you need sexual images or video to be spread for it to qualify as revenge porn”. Simply replace “images and video” with “creative content” and we have included Anderson’s news piece and plenty more into the arena of what qualifies. We can make the case that we are doing them a favor by including more types of content into the scope of the standard to protect “as many potential sexual abuse victims as possible”. Let them squirm to explain to us why not all sexual abuse victims are victims or how not all sexual abuse is “abuse”. Another technicality they may use is that “slut-shaming’ can only happen to women, and that men do not suffer from this stigma of being seen as a “slut” if they have numerous sexual partners. This can easily be twisted back around if we simply re-frame the point under progressive equality. “We will come to future where women may lose the stigma, but the men may gain it. It is important that we recognize that many and all genders can be victimized and shamed against whatever standards an individual’s actions are being juxtaposed against.” Let them rationalize to us how men don’t deserve this protection as the other innumerable genders that “exist” do.

We must not waste opportunities like this to expose, and even shatter some of the New Left’s sacred cows. Such opportunities, especially while trending and possess a “hot-button” status, need to be taken advantage. They need to be harnessed and re-framed in the prevailing leftist logic, and delivered right back. It is usually Leftists who fail to articulate their own internal ideological inconsistencies or contradictions. It is important to not necessarily help them see the light with conservative ideals and beliefs. Instead, it may be best to highlight just how Stormy their own beliefs and ideals are.

Latest posts by team (see all)

Leave a Reply

*